Draymond Green selects a squad of fearless competitors, including LeBron James and Nikola Jokic. Green
disclosed his choices for the four players he would most like to face in combat. Although the four-time champion
was compelled to omit his Warriors colleagues, Green’s choices demonstrated his respect for players throughout
the league who epitomize tenacity and toughness.
“I’m going with Ja Morant. He is not going to back down from anyone. When Ja says he’s running up that MF and
up the chimney. I’m taking ‘Bron and I’m taking Ja.”
“Dude, I’m taking Joker. What an animal that dude is. He is a beast. He remains silent. He doesn’t show off. You
are not moving him from his position. You’re not just giving him a blank stare. As if nothing is bothering him. He
is a creature. I’m going to take him. And he’s pleasant.”
LeBron James and Ja Morant, two players known for their audacious approaches to the game, were among his
selections. But many were taken aback by Green’s selection of Nikola Jokic, the standout center for the Denver
Nuggets, including Jamal Crawford, a guest on “The Draymond Green Show.” Green lauded Jokic’s unwavering
presence and unflappable manner, calling him a “animal” on the floor.
Given Green’s background with European big men—including instances involving Domantas Sabonis and Jusuf
Nurkic—the choice of Jokic would have surprised some. But Green’s recognition of Jokic’s growth over time and
their mutual regard for one another’s skill set demonstrate the NBA players’ togetherness.
Jokic is regarded as one of the greatest players in the world because of his ability to control the game on both ends
of the court. Jokic is a difficult opponent for any team because of his unassuming demeanor and undeniable
influence on the field.
Green chose Shai Gilgeous-Alexander to complete his squad, highlighting the rookie guard’s skill and versatility.
Choosing Morant, James, Jokic, and Gilgeous-Alexander as his “warriors,” Green put together a lineup that would
be extremely difficult for any rival to handle.
In the end, Green’s choices show how much he values athletes who possess the tenacity and spirit of competition
required to be successful in the NBA. Green understands the importance of having teammates that share his
dedication to compete at the top level and winning, regardless of team membership.
Although having Nikola Jokic, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, LeBron James, Ja Morant, and Draymond Green on a
squad sounds like a strong combination, it’s important to consider whether or not they could go 82-0.
I have no doubt that this imaginary club is filled with talented players. Jokic would surely be the team’s rock as
the current MVP of the Finals and the greatest player in the world. LeBron, Jokic, and Shai are some of the
players who can create plays and score goals alongside him; LeBron and Jokic are especially skilled in the post.
While Draymond Green is a standout defender known for his versatility and basketball IQ, the other players in
the lineup can also play defense, albeit to differing degrees.
Though the club is talented on paper, a number of things could prevent them from having a perfect season.
Although they are respected by defenders, Draymond and Ja are not very skilled outside the arc, so perimeter
shooting might be a problem. This might reduce the team’s offensive effectiveness and spacing, especially in a
league where three-point shooting is so important.
Furthermore, concerns regarding LeBron and Green’s durability and consistency over the course of a season are
raised by their ages and skill levels. Even while both players offer priceless leadership and expertise, the demands
of an 82-game schedule could be too much for them, possibly resulting in sporadic losses.
In conclusion, an 82-0 record would be an incredible accomplishment, even if this hypothetical club surely has
the skills and skill to compete at a high level. A team may face obstacles along the way due to factors like player
durability, defensive consistency, and perimeter shooting, which suggests that 5–6 defeats during the season are
not only possible but possibly unavoidable given the current situation.
